Communication

Existing workforces value honest communication and regular feedback from their managers or leaders. Often, organizations consider yearly reviews to be enough – but if they only give formal feedback every year, they miss a helpful opportunity to connect and engage with their employees (Burleson, and Samter, 1990).

A study by Gallup shows that teaching employees and managers to have frequent, meaningful conversations regarding work anticipations and progress guides to higher performance and engagement (Doloi, 2009).  Regular one-on-one gatherings with each team member are critical to establishing personal, genuine relationships with employees and provide managers valuable understanding of what motivates/demotivates their individuals. By meeting regularly with their staff, managers may build trust, adequately address employee problems, and assist them in achieving their objectives resulting in more satisfied and engaged employees (Genç, 2017).

Effective and clear communication strategies have changed with the emergence of new communication technologies. Regardless of the organization's industry or select communication channels, the purpose remains the same: concise and clear information exchange in the workplace. In addition, keep the following essential elements of clear and effective communication in mind when creating or enhancing an organization's employee communication strategy (Saad, et al, 2018).

Lartey, and Randall, (2021) shares that communication requires precision. In corporate communication, accuracy involves speaking and writing with no or minimal errors. Proofreading to remove grammatical mistakes and fact-checking to verify the correct information are all part of accurate communication. By prioritizing accuracy in communication for employees and managers, common company processes can be streamlined as well as misunderstandings can be reduced (Welch, 2011).

Business communication requires brevity. Brevity is the skill of conveying data with as few words as possible while making the message clear. Concise messaging is critical to modern businesses amid many workplace distractions competing for employee attention. Additionally, most employees do not have time to read long memos or emails. Messages can be kept concise to help the organization's team absorb the information and give its words more influence (Lartey, and Randall, 2021).

Openness is critical to two-way communication (Doloi, 2009). The organization's poor and ineffective communication record cannot be about substandard methodologies. It may arise from cultural problems. Individuals are less likely to report issues if they anticipate being reprimanded or annoyed, so more mistakes slip thru the cracks. Just saying that effective communication is valued in the organization's culture doesn't do it. The organization must indicate that everyone is welcome to express their opinions before employees feel safe to take the opportunity. Higher employee morale can be seen when the organization is committed to reducing frustration (Burleson, and Samter, 1990).

The organization's process depends on the experience and needs of its team. A short weekly check-in or a more suitable in-depth monthly review can work well. Organizations can experiment with frequency to discover what works best for their employees (Genç, 2017).

In order to enhance employee engagement, the organization's managers need to buy in and create priorities. The simplest method is to decompress and divide the information into actionable items. Managers are more driven to solve problems when they understand both the problem and how to address it. Leaders or managers are better positioned to handle problems at the source when the individual factors that comprise the engagement score are presented (Lartey, and Randall, 2021).

Improving communication within the organization's business process is a simple - but time-consuming - process. To see progress in the more extensive workforce, the organization's leadership team and fabric must first properly strengthen and improve its communication skills, respectful, clear communication possible (Lartey, and Randall, 2021).

Managers shape workplace culture, playing an important role as leadership decision-makers and messengers. Nevertheless, many managers can feel unprepared to communicate well with their staff. Here are five suggestions for strengthening managerial communication skills of the workplace (Tulsky, 2005).

Being friendly is an easy method to change the company's communication strategy and is one of the most effective. Taking a genuine interest in the personal lives of the team at the organization and remembering what they told the organization shows that the organization cares about what they say. This relationship may encourage even the quietest team members in the organization to speak up because they are not afraid of being ignored or reprimanded (Doloi, 2009).

Casual conversation is one of the methods to build friendships with the company's team. Also, if some workers find it challenging to relax in a work background, consider spending time with the team outside of work. It will foster workplace collaboration and teamwork while enhancing communication. Furthermore, schedule team-building exercises and activities to strengthen bonds between teams and managers and enhance positive teamwork and collaboration.

Reference

  •  Burleson, B.R. and Samter, W., (1990). Effects of cognitive complexity on the perceived importance of communication skills in friends. Communication Research17(2), pp.165-182.

  • Doloi, H., (2009). Relational partnerships: the importance of communication, trust and confidence and joint risk management in achieving project success. Construction Management and Economics27(11), pp.1099-1109.

  • Genç, R., (2017). The importance of communication in sustainability & sustainable strategies. Procedia Manufacturing8, pp.511-516.

  • Lartey, F.M. and Randall, P.M., (2021). Indicators of computer-mediated communication affecting remote employee engagement. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies9(01), p.82.

  • Politi, M.C. and Street, R.L., (2011). The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice17(4), pp.579-584.

  • Saad, Z.M., Sudin, S. and Shamsuddin, N., (2018). The influence of leadership style, personality attributes and employee communication on employee engagement. Global Business and Management Research10(3), p.743.

  • Tulsky, J.A., (2005). Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life. Jama294(3), pp.359-365.

  • Welch, M., (2011). The evolution of the employee engagement concept: communication implications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal.

Comments

  1. In addition to the methods of communication discussed above, by many ways organizations have evolved in directions that make the latter view more appropriate. Changes confronting organizations and the associated changes in organizational
    forms have made organizational communication increasingly important to overall organizational
    functioning. Below are few reasons
    ♦ Work is more complex and requires greater coordination and interaction among workers
    ♦ The pace of work is faster
    ♦ Workers are more distributed
    ♦ Simultaneous, distributed work processes are more common
    ♦ Knowledge and innovation are more critical to an organization’s competitive advantage
    ♦ Communication technologies and networks are increasingly essential to an organization’s
    structure and strategy.
    Communication is not only an essential aspect of these recent organizational changes, but
    effective communication can be seen as the foundation of modern organizations (Grenier and
    Metes 1992; D’Aprix 1996; Witherspoon 1997; von Krogh et al. 2000).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing the information. And also, four characteristics have a significant impact on employee engagement. Internal communication is one such variable. It is critical to build a transparent culture in the business in order to involve employees in the firm's aims (Zainol et al, 2016). Brownell (1989) defines communication as "the flow of information from one person to another, whether or whether it generates confidence." However, the information sent must be intelligible to the receiver."

      Delete
  2. A great blog article Prabuddha, I would like to add that Knowing communication is susceptible to breakdown would make the communicator proactive in ensuring to avoid communication obstacles. ‘A good communicator anticipates problems in encoding, transmitting, and decoding a message’ (Guffey and Loewy, 2021). Therefore, effective communication also needs to focus on the receiver’s context and ensure that the right message is received, breaking barriers to communication.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing the information. And also, Brownell (1989) defines communication as "the flow of information from one person to another, whether or whether it generates confidence." However, the information sent must be intelligible to the receiver." According to Goldhaber (1990), corporate communication is "the act of developing and exchanging messages within a network of interdependent relationships to cope with environmental unpredictability."

      Delete
  3. Great content Rashmi, further to add according to Bucata and Rizecsu (2017), Communication makes possible the interaction between members of the working team. A manager should be the first to establish bridges between the members of the organization, through careful and effective communication. Through communication, organization activities scroll correctly. A good manager will use communication to make it understandable to convey its message receptor exactly as we think in order to obtain the expected feedback at the time of the initiation of the communicative process. And also, Effective workplace communication benefits employees' job satisfaction, organizational productivity, and customer service (Adu-Oppong & Agyin-Birikorang, 2014). And it is a required feature for service industries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing the information. And also, at the organizational level, there is no clear relationship between involvement and communication. Employee engagement programs frequently fail due to a lack of integration. An organization that does not have strong communication among its employees will not be able to develop engaged employees. A disengaged employee will generate a terrible mood in the company, affecting both the man and the machine. This will almost likely result in a loss of earnings and reputation for the firm (Goldhaber, 1990).

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting article. Moreover, with the new levels of offline and online communications, employees
    means of communication preferences and comfort levels vary (Sproul and Kiesler, 1986). With the distinctions in understanding the two phenomenas, it is evident that both forms of communication will be subject to different problems.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing the information. And also, Employees regard the communication as proof of their importance to the company. They are effectively engaged in what is occurring within the organization if they are directly and constantly informed about significant concerns. Employees that feel valued are more productive, more inclined to take initiative, and frequently more eager to participate in innovation (Tulsky, 2005).

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog